Published by James Diekmann, VUV Analytics on August 2, 2018

GC-VUV versus UV-Vis Spectroscopy & Synchrotron Labs

To get a better grasp on VUV technology, I believe it is important to compare VUV spectra to technologies that have already probed near or around the vacuum ultraviolet region (e.g. ≤200nm). Two examples come to my mind: synchrotron laboratories and UV-Vis spectrophotometers.

Synchrotron laboratories are ginormous multi-billion-dollar facilities that house huge magnets to accelerate charged particles. Consequently, as these particles accelerate to very high speeds, they release energy in the form of light, dubbed synchrotron radiation. This radiation can be used to probe the electronic states of molecules, yielding an absorbance spectrum spanning from 100nm to 300nm.

GC-VUV vs UV-VIS

Figure 1. is a crude drawling of a charge particle (green) following a magnetic field (blue). As it accelerates around the magnetic field, it releases synchrotron radiation (purple).

UV-Vis spectrophotometry uses UV-Vis radiation (200nm – 400m) to probe a small amount of liquid in a sample cell. The remaining unabsorbed light is then used to fingerprint the compound of interest, shown in Figure 2.

GC-VUV vs. UV-VIS

Figure 2. is a simple representation of a UV-Vis spectrophotometer. As light from a deuterium lamp is sorted through a prism/diffraction grating, a slit is used to isolate a subset of wavelengths, which are absorbed in the sample cell. The transmitted light from the sample cell is used to produce an absorbance spectrum.

Similarly, VUV spectroscopy probes gas phase molecules (125-240nm for the VGA-100 or 125-430nm for the VGA-101), emerging from a gas chromatograph. The remaining, unabsorbed light is used to produce a spectral fingerprint shown in Figure 3.

GC-VUV vs UV-Vis

Figure 3. is a simplified version of the VUV spectrometer. As effluent from the GC enters the flow cell, light from the deuterium lamp is absorbed by the compound. The remaining (transmitted) light strikes a diffraction grating, resolving the individual wavelengths, which is then collected on a CCD, producing an absorbance spectrum.

Now that we know the differences between synchrotron, UV-Vis and VUV, how does VUV spectra compare to data produced from a multi-billion-dollar synchrotron facility and a commonly use UV-Vis spectrophotometer? Well, let’s examine anthracene. Figure 4 shows a composite of synchrotron (green), UV-vis (blue), and VUV (black) spectra. Notice how synchrotron radiation captures the shorter wavelength ranges (140-300nm), while UV-Vis captures the longer (300-370nm). Nicely enough, where the synchrotron spectrum ends, the UV-Vis spectrum picks up. But what you should notice is how VUV covers the entire range (130-430nm)! Just think, VUV technology (specifically the VGA-101) is able to generate spectra similar to a multi-billion-dollar synchrotron facility and a UV-Vis spectrophotometer.

GC-VUV vs UV-VIS

Figure 4. A synchrotron (green), UV-Vis (blue), is overlaid on the VUV spectrum (black) of anthracene. Theses spectra were obtained from Mainz’s, NIST, and VUV Analytics Inc., respectively.

Lear more about the publisher, James Diekmann, here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

14 − 4 =