Published Jack Cochran on August 15, 2017
Detectability in static headspace – GC for residual solvent analysis is largely driven by a solvent’s ability to partition from the pharmaceutical ingredient diluent into the headspace for sampling. In pharma lingo, ingredients are “articles” and there are water-soluble articles and water-insoluble articles that must be analyzed for residual solvents. For our static headspace – GC-VUV work, we started with water-soluble articles (see other blog post links below).
Water-insoluble articles present more of a challenge for residual solvents analysis. First, there are many possible diluents that can be used including dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), dimethylformamide (DMF), 1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazolidinone (DMI), N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAC), and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP). Even benzyl alcohol and ionic liquids have been employed to dissolve water-insoluble articles. These diluents have one thing in common – relatively low volatility so they don’t interfere with analysis of residual solvents by chromatographic coelution, including that stimulated by overloading the GC column. Unfortunately, these diluents tend to “hold onto” many residual solvents tenaciously during static headspace sampling. More residual solvent in the diluent = less residual solvent in the headspace = lower detectability.
Fortunately, another property of these solvents, except for benzyl alcohol, is their miscibility with water. After dissolving a water-insoluble article in an appropriate diluent (e.g., DMSO), a simple 1:1 dilution with water can often result in a great improvement in static headspace sampling, and thus, detectability for many residual solvents (Figure 1).
Other reading on residual solvents analysis using static headspace – GC-VUV.